Skip to main content

Opportunity and Occasion - Differences


Opportunity and Occasion 

Opportunity and occasion are two words that have different meanings and implications in the context of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Here is a brief explanation of the difference between opportunity and occasion with special reference to the Indian Evidence Act:

Opportunity 

- Opportunity refers to a favorable circumstance or chance that allows for the occurrence or transaction of relevant facts or facts in issue. Opportunity is one of the criteria for determining the relevancy of facts under Section 7 of the Indian Evidence Act, which states that "Facts which are occasion, cause or effect, immediate or otherwise, of relevant facts, or facts in issue, or which constitute the state of things under which they happened, or which afforded an opportunity for their occurrence or transaction, are relevant."

 For example, if A is accused of poisoning B, the fact that A knew B's habits and health condition, which afforded an opportunity for the administration of poison, is a relevant fact under Section 7.

Occasion 

- Occasion refers to a specific event or situation that is significant and often celebrated, or a specific opportunity or chance that arises as a result of a particular event or situation. Occasion is not a specific term used in the Indian Evidence Act, but it can be related to the concept of res gestae, which means "things done" or "things said and done". Res gestae is a doctrine that allows the admission of facts which are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, under Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, which states that "Facts which, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, are relevant, whether they occurred at the same time and place or at different times and places."

For example, if A is accused of murdering B by beating him, the fact that B said "A has killed me" before dying, is a relevant fact under Section 6, as it is part of the same transaction and occasion of the murder.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping law s and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to...

Companies act ,2013

Companies Act, 2013 Meaning and Nature of a Company with Emphasis on its Advantages 1. Meaning of a Company : A company is a legal entity formed by a group of individuals to engage in and operate a business commercial or industrial enterprise. It is governed by the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in India. According to Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, "Company means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law." Lord Justice Lindley : "A company is an association of many persons who contribute money or money's worth to a common stock and employ it for a common purpose. The common stock so contributed is denoted in money and is the capital of the company." A company is an artificial person created by law. It has a separate legal identity distinct from its members. It can enter into contracts, own property, sue, and be sued in its own name. 2. Nature of a Company : The nature of a company can be understood through its key ...

JURISPRUDENCE

  JURISPRUDENCE   Jurisprudence is derived from Latin word ‘juris-prudentia’- knowledge of law or skill in law. Study of jurisprudence first started by Romans. Jeremy Bentham(1748-1832) is known as father of  modern jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is basically the theoretical aspect of the word law. In jurisprudence, we do not deal with the practically applicable pieces of statutory law; rather we try to understand the very essence of law and its various dimensions. Like in the other subjects, for example, geography, we have geographical thought as a subject of study, similarly, in law we have got "legal thought" which is called "jurisprudence". The basic questions that we try to answer in jurisprudence are - What is law?, Why should it exist?. What should be the nature and purpose of the law?, What are rights and duties and what should be their nature?, What is ownership and possession and why does law have to protect them?, etc. Jurisprudence refers to a certain type...