Opportunity and Occasion

Opportunity and Occasion - Differences

Opportunity and Occasion

Opportunity and occasion are two words that have different meanings and implications in the context of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Here is a brief explanation of the difference between opportunity and occasion with special reference to the Indian Evidence Act:

Opportunity

- Opportunity refers to a favorable circumstance or chance that allows for the occurrence or transaction of relevant facts or facts in issue. Opportunity is one of the criteria for determining the relevancy of facts under Section 7 of the Indian Evidence Act, which states that "Facts which are occasion, cause or effect, immediate or otherwise, of relevant facts, or facts in issue, or which constitute the state of things under which they happened, or which afforded an opportunity for their occurrence or transaction, are relevant."

For example, if A is accused of poisoning B, the fact that A knew B's habits and health condition, which afforded an opportunity for the administration of poison, is a relevant fact under Section 7.

Occasion

- Occasion refers to a specific event or situation that is significant and often celebrated, or a specific opportunity or chance that arises as a result of a particular event or situation. Occasion is not a specific term used in the Indian Evidence Act, but it can be related to the concept of res gestae, which means "things done" or "things said and done". Res gestae is a doctrine that allows the admission of facts which are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, under Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, which states that "Facts which, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, are relevant, whether they occurred at the same time and place or at different times and places."

For example, if A is accused of murdering B by beating him, the fact that B said "A has killed me" before dying, is a relevant fact under Section 6, as it is part of the same transaction and occasion of the murder.

Comments

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping laws and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to ...

APPEALS - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

Appeals "The word "appeal" means the right of carrying a particular case from an inferior court to a superior court with a view to ascertain whether the judgement is sustainable. An appeal is a creature of statute only and a right of appeal exists where expressly given. A right of appeal is neither an inherent right nor a fundamental right. Right to appeal is not merely a procedural right. It is a substantive right as well. This right accrues on the date of lis though it may be exercised later. Section 372 provides that no appeal lie from any judgment or order of a criminal court except as provided for this Code or any other law for the time being in force." Right of victim to file appeal : In Section 372 a proviso was inserted by Cr.P.C. (Amendment) Act, 2008, provides that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the court (i) Acquitting the accused; or (ii) Convicting for a lesser offence; or (iii) Imposing inadequate com...

JURISPRUDENCE

JURISPRUDENCE Jurisprudence is derived from Latin word ‘juris-prudentia’- knowledge of law or skill in law. Study of jurisprudence first started by Romans. Jeremy Bentham(1748-1832) is known as father of modern jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is basically the theoretical aspect of the word law. In jurisprudence, we do not deal with the practically applicable pieces of statutory law; rather we try to understand the very essence of law and its various dimensions. Like in the other subjects, for example, geography, we have geographical thought as a subject of study, similarly, in law we have got "legal thought" which is called "jurisprudence". The basic questions that we try to answer in jurisprudence are - What is law?, Why should it exist?. What should be the nature and purpose of the law?, What are rights and duties and what should be their nature?, What is ownership and possession and why does law have to protect them?, etc. Jurisprudence refers to a certain type...

LAWACADEMY

Search This Blog