Skip to main content

Proof and Evidence , BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023


Proof and Evidence

Proof and Evidence are two terms that have different meanings and implications in the context of the THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023 (the Act). Here is a brief explanation of the difference between proof and evidence with special reference to the Act:

Evidence 

- Evidence refers to information or facts that help us to establish the truth or existence of something. Evidence can be of two types: oral evidence, which includes statements made by witnesses relevant to the matter under inquiry and presented with court authorization, and documentary evidence, which comprises documents, whether physical or electronic, submitted to the court for examination. Evidence can also be classified as direct evidence, which offers clear and conclusive proof of a fact without the need for interpretation, and indirect evidence, which requires inference or presumption to prove a fact. Evidence can be strong or weak, conclusive or inconclusive, depending on the quality and quantity of the information. Evidence can also be challenged, contradicted, or refuted by other evidence.

Proof

- Proof is the sum of evidence which helps to prove something. Proof is more concrete and conclusive than evidence. Proof shows that a statement, a fact, or a claim is true beyond any doubt. Proof can be used in legal or scientific contexts, where a high level of certainty is required. Proof is usually the result of a logical argument, a mathematical demonstration, or an empirical test. Proof is not subject to dispute or revision, unless there is an error or a fraud. Proof can also be classified as primary proof, which pertains to original documents or firsthand information, and secondary proof, which involves copies of documents or hearsay information, admissible in court under specific conditions.


The Act provides various provisions for determining the relevancy, admissibility, and sufficiency of evidence and proof in legal proceedings. The Act also defines the terms "may presume", "shall presume", and "conclusive proof" to indicate the degree of force or effect of certain facts or evidence on the proof of other facts or evidence. The Act also lays down the rules for the burden of proof, the competency and examination of witnesses, the production and effect of evidence, and the presumption as to documents.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping laws and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to ...

APPEALS - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

  Appeals "The word "appeal" means the right of carrying a particular case from an inferior court to a superior court with a view to ascertain whether the judgement is sustainable. An appeal is a creature of statute only and a right of appeal exists where expressly given. A right of appeal is neither an inherent right nor a fundamental right. Right to appeal is not merely a procedural right. It is a substantive right as well. This right accrues on the date of lis though it may be exercised later. Section 372 provides that no appeal lie from any judgment or order of a criminal court except as provided for this Code or any other law for the time being in force." Right of victim to file appeal : In Section 372 a proviso was inserted by Cr.P.C. (Amendment) Act, 2008, provides that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the court (i) Acquitting the accused; or (ii) Convicting for a lesser offence; or (iii) Imposing inadequate com...

JURISPRUDENCE

  JURISPRUDENCE   Jurisprudence is derived from Latin word ‘juris-prudentia’- knowledge of law or skill in law. Study of jurisprudence first started by Romans. Jeremy Bentham(1748-1832) is known as father of  modern jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is basically the theoretical aspect of the word law. In jurisprudence, we do not deal with the practically applicable pieces of statutory law; rather we try to understand the very essence of law and its various dimensions. Like in the other subjects, for example, geography, we have geographical thought as a subject of study, similarly, in law we have got "legal thought" which is called "jurisprudence". The basic questions that we try to answer in jurisprudence are - What is law?, Why should it exist?. What should be the nature and purpose of the law?, What are rights and duties and what should be their nature?, What is ownership and possession and why does law have to protect them?, etc. Jurisprudence refers to a certain type...