Can a Report be published by the media, which discloses the identity of a sexually assaulted child?

Can a report be published by the media, which discloses the identity of a sexually assaulted child?

No, the media is prohibited from disclosing the identity of a sexually assaulted child under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Section 23 of the Act states that:

> No person shall make any report or present comments on any child from any form of media or studio or photographic facilities without having complete and authentic information, which may have the effect of lowering his reputation or infringing upon his privacy.

The Act also imposes a penalty of imprisonment up to six months or fine or both for violating this provision. The media is expected to follow certain guidelines while reporting cases of sexual offences against children, such as using a pseudonym for the child, not revealing the address, school, or other details that may lead to the identification of the child, and ensuring the confidentiality of the child's identity. The media is also required to report any case of sexual offence against a child to the Special Juvenile Police Unit or the local police within 24 hours of receiving such information.

But is there any circumstances when it can be published???

Yes, with the permission of the Special Court, the media can disclose the identity of a sexually assaulted child under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. However, this permission is granted only in exceptional circumstances, such as when it is in the best interest of the child or when the child himself or herself consents to it. The Special Court has to record the reasons for granting such permission in writing. The media has to ensure that the disclosure does not harm the dignity or privacy of the child in any way.

Comments

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping law s and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to...

JURISPRUDENCE

JURISPRUDENCE Jurisprudence is derived from Latin word ‘juris-prudentia’- knowledge of law or skill in law. Study of jurisprudence first started by Romans. Jeremy Bentham(1748-1832) is known as father of modern jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is basically the theoretical aspect of the word law. In jurisprudence, we do not deal with the practically applicable pieces of statutory law; rather we try to understand the very essence of law and its various dimensions. Like in the other subjects, for example, geography, we have geographical thought as a subject of study, similarly, in law we have got "legal thought" which is called "jurisprudence". The basic questions that we try to answer in jurisprudence are - What is law?, Why should it exist?. What should be the nature and purpose of the law?, What are rights and duties and what should be their nature?, What is ownership and possession and why does law have to protect them?, etc. Jurisprudence refers to a certain type...

Musahar Sahu and Another v. Lala Hakim Lal and Another, 43 I.A. 151 (P.C. 1915). Section 53 - Fradulent transfer

Musahar Sahu and Another v. Lala Hakim Lal and Another, 43 I.A. 151 (P.C. 1915). This citation indicates that the case was decided by the Privy Council (P.C.) in 1915, and reported in volume 43 of the Indian Appeals (I.A.), starting from page 151. The case of Musahar Sahu and Another v. Lala Hakim Lal and Another was a dispute over the validity of two conveyances of land executed by a debtor, Kishun Benode, to his relatives, Kamta Prashad and Hakim Lal, on 2nd September 1901. The plaintiff, Musahar Sahu, was a creditor of Kishun Benode who had obtained a judgment against him on 5th December 1901. The plaintiff sought to set aside the conveyances on the ground that they were made with intent to defeat or delay his claim, under section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The courts gave different verdicts on the two conveyances. The first conveyance, in favour of Kamta Prashad, was set aside by the Subordinate Judge and the High Court, as it was found to be without consi...

LAWACADEMY

Search This Blog