Skip to main content

Can a Report be published by the media, which discloses the identity of a sexually assaulted child?



Can a report be published by the media, which discloses the identity of a sexually assaulted child?
No, the media is prohibited from disclosing the identity of a sexually assaulted child under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Section 23 of the Act states that:

> No person shall make any report or present comments on any child from any form of media or studio or photographic facilities without having complete and authentic information, which may have the effect of lowering his reputation or infringing upon his privacy.

The Act also imposes a penalty of imprisonment up to six months or fine or both for violating this provision. The media is expected to follow certain guidelines while reporting cases of sexual offences against children, such as using a pseudonym for the child, not revealing the address, school, or other details that may lead to the identification of the child, and ensuring the confidentiality of the child's identity. The media is also required to report any case of sexual offence against a child to the Special Juvenile Police Unit or the local police within 24 hours of receiving such information.

But is there any circumstances when it can be published???

Yes, with the permission of the Special Court, the media can disclose the identity of a sexually assaulted child under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. However, this permission is granted only in exceptional circumstances, such as when it is in the best interest of the child or when the child himself or herself consents to it. The Special Court has to record the reasons for granting such permission in writing. The media has to ensure that the disclosure does not harm the dignity or privacy of the child in any way.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping law s and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to...
Post a Comment
Read more

Companies act ,2013

Companies Act, 2013 Meaning and Nature of a Company with Emphasis on its Advantages 1. Meaning of a Company : A company is a legal entity formed by a group of individuals to engage in and operate a business commercial or industrial enterprise. It is governed by the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in India. According to Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, "Company means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law." Lord Justice Lindley : "A company is an association of many persons who contribute money or money's worth to a common stock and employ it for a common purpose. The common stock so contributed is denoted in money and is the capital of the company." A company is an artificial person created by law. It has a separate legal identity distinct from its members. It can enter into contracts, own property, sue, and be sued in its own name. 2. Nature of a Company : The nature of a company can be understood through its key ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Interlocutory order

  Interlocutory order Rule 6 to 10 of Order 39 mention certain interlocutory orders that can be made by the court. The term 'interlocutory order' is not defined in the Code. It means an order passed by a court during pendency of a suit or in course of execution proceedings which do not determine the substantive rights of the parties in respect of subject-matter of the suit but relates to the protection of the subject-matter of the suit or for ensuring determination of merits of the case. For eg.: (i) Ordering sale of perishable property in certain cases [Rule 6] (ii) Order for detention, preservation or inspection of any property forming subject-matter of suit [Rule 7]. (iii) Order authorizing any person to enter into any land or buildings and take samples or try experiments [Rule 8]. (iv) Order to deposit the money held by a person as a trustee, in court [Rule 10], etc.
Post a Comment
Read more