Skip to main content

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MITAKSHARA & DAYABHAGA:

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MITAKSHARA & DAYABHAGA:

Mitakshara and Dayabhaga are two major schools of Hindu law that differ in their approach to property inheritance and the distribution of assets among family members. Here are some of the main differences:

  • Mitakshara recognizes the joint family system and the coparcenary property, which is the ancestral property shared by the male members of the family. Dayabhaga does not recognize the joint family system and the coparcenary property, but only the individual and separate property of the family members.
  • Mitakshara follows the principle of survivorship, which means that on the death of a coparcener, his share devolves to the surviving coparceners by operation of law. Dayabhaga follows the principle of partition, which means that on the death of a person, his property is divided among his heirs according to his will or the law.
  • Mitakshara gives primacy to the birthright of the sons over the widow’s right in the inheritance of the father’s property. Dayabhaga gives equal rights to the widow and the sons in the inheritance of the father’s property.
  • Mitakshara adopts a strict and uniform scheme of succession based on the proximity of relationship and the spiritual benefit to the deceased. Dayabhaga adopts a flexible and varied scheme of succession based on the religious merit and the legal capacity of the heirs.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping law s and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to...
Post a Comment
Read more

Companies act ,2013

Companies Act, 2013 Meaning and Nature of a Company with Emphasis on its Advantages 1. Meaning of a Company : A company is a legal entity formed by a group of individuals to engage in and operate a business commercial or industrial enterprise. It is governed by the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in India. According to Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, "Company means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law." Lord Justice Lindley : "A company is an association of many persons who contribute money or money's worth to a common stock and employ it for a common purpose. The common stock so contributed is denoted in money and is the capital of the company." A company is an artificial person created by law. It has a separate legal identity distinct from its members. It can enter into contracts, own property, sue, and be sued in its own name. 2. Nature of a Company : The nature of a company can be understood through its key ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Interlocutory order

  Interlocutory order Rule 6 to 10 of Order 39 mention certain interlocutory orders that can be made by the court. The term 'interlocutory order' is not defined in the Code. It means an order passed by a court during pendency of a suit or in course of execution proceedings which do not determine the substantive rights of the parties in respect of subject-matter of the suit but relates to the protection of the subject-matter of the suit or for ensuring determination of merits of the case. For eg.: (i) Ordering sale of perishable property in certain cases [Rule 6] (ii) Order for detention, preservation or inspection of any property forming subject-matter of suit [Rule 7]. (iii) Order authorizing any person to enter into any land or buildings and take samples or try experiments [Rule 8]. (iv) Order to deposit the money held by a person as a trustee, in court [Rule 10], etc.
Post a Comment
Read more