Skip to main content

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MITAKSHARA & DAYABHAGA:

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MITAKSHARA & DAYABHAGA:

Mitakshara and Dayabhaga are two major schools of Hindu law that differ in their approach to property inheritance and the distribution of assets among family members. Here are some of the main differences:

  • Mitakshara recognizes the joint family system and the coparcenary property, which is the ancestral property shared by the male members of the family. Dayabhaga does not recognize the joint family system and the coparcenary property, but only the individual and separate property of the family members.
  • Mitakshara follows the principle of survivorship, which means that on the death of a coparcener, his share devolves to the surviving coparceners by operation of law. Dayabhaga follows the principle of partition, which means that on the death of a person, his property is divided among his heirs according to his will or the law.
  • Mitakshara gives primacy to the birthright of the sons over the widow’s right in the inheritance of the father’s property. Dayabhaga gives equal rights to the widow and the sons in the inheritance of the father’s property.
  • Mitakshara adopts a strict and uniform scheme of succession based on the proximity of relationship and the spiritual benefit to the deceased. Dayabhaga adopts a flexible and varied scheme of succession based on the religious merit and the legal capacity of the heirs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping laws and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to ...

APPEALS - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

  Appeals "The word "appeal" means the right of carrying a particular case from an inferior court to a superior court with a view to ascertain whether the judgement is sustainable. An appeal is a creature of statute only and a right of appeal exists where expressly given. A right of appeal is neither an inherent right nor a fundamental right. Right to appeal is not merely a procedural right. It is a substantive right as well. This right accrues on the date of lis though it may be exercised later. Section 372 provides that no appeal lie from any judgment or order of a criminal court except as provided for this Code or any other law for the time being in force." Right of victim to file appeal : In Section 372 a proviso was inserted by Cr.P.C. (Amendment) Act, 2008, provides that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the court (i) Acquitting the accused; or (ii) Convicting for a lesser offence; or (iii) Imposing inadequate com...

JURISPRUDENCE

  JURISPRUDENCE   Jurisprudence is derived from Latin word ‘juris-prudentia’- knowledge of law or skill in law. Study of jurisprudence first started by Romans. Jeremy Bentham(1748-1832) is known as father of  modern jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is basically the theoretical aspect of the word law. In jurisprudence, we do not deal with the practically applicable pieces of statutory law; rather we try to understand the very essence of law and its various dimensions. Like in the other subjects, for example, geography, we have geographical thought as a subject of study, similarly, in law we have got "legal thought" which is called "jurisprudence". The basic questions that we try to answer in jurisprudence are - What is law?, Why should it exist?. What should be the nature and purpose of the law?, What are rights and duties and what should be their nature?, What is ownership and possession and why does law have to protect them?, etc. Jurisprudence refers to a certain type...