Skip to main content

Joint Hindu Family, Coparcenary, Karta

 Joint Hindu Family

Joint Hindu Family consists of common male ancestor, his wife and all his lineal male descendents together with their wives, widows and unmarried daughters and also daughters of male descendants Joint Hindu Family has no separate legal entity. It is neither a juristic person nor a corporation.

A Joint Hindu Family can neither be created by the act of the members nor by an agreement between the parties A stranger cannot be made a member of Joint Hindu Family. The only exception is mat riage and adoption.

Law will presume that every Hindu family is a joint one unless the contrary is proved.

There must be at least two members to constitute a joint family and they must be Hindus.

For bringing a Joint Hindu Family in existence a common male ancestor is necessary but for its continu ance common male ancestor is not necessary.

Coparcenary

Position before 2005 Amendment: Coparcenary comprised of continuous chain of four genera- tions of male members. (including the last holder of the property). It is a narrower body within a joint family.

Mirakshara concept of coparcenary is based on the notion of son's birth right in the joint family property. Coparceners acquire interest in the joint family property by birth.

Mitakshara coparcenary comes to an end either by partition or by death of last surviving coparcener. 

Existence of a joint family property is essential in a coparcenary.

Initially coparcenary carried with itself doctrine of survivorship. It means that on the death of a co-parcener, his interest in the joint family property will devolve on surviving coparceners by rule of survivorship and not by succession.

This doctrine was diluted by Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and finally abolished by 2005 amendment.

Position after 2005 Amendment: Section 6(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was amended by Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. It brought about the following changes:-

  1. The daughter (married or unmarried) of a coparcener shall by birth become a coparcener in her own right in the same manner as son. 
  2. She has the same right in the coparcenary property as she would have had if she had been a son.
  3. She shall be subject to same liabilities in respect of the said coparcenary property as that of a son.

→ Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 also abolished the doctrine of survivorship. Now the interest of the deceased coparcener will devolve by testamentary or intestate succession and not by survivorship

→ In Arshnoor Singh v. Harpal Kaur & Ors. (2019), Supreme Court held that the rule under Mitakshara law that whenever a male ancestor inherits any property from any of his paternal ancestors upto three degrees above him, then his male legal heirs upto three degrees below him would get an equal right as coparceners in that property will apply in cases of succession which opened before Hindu Sucesion Act 1956.

Karta

The affair of the joint Hindu family has to be managed by some male member. The senior-most male member who manages the affairs of the Joint Hindu Family is called "Karta"."

He is regarded as the head of the family and possesses the supreme position in the affairs of the family Generally, a senior most coparcener of a Joint Family is the 'Karta". This presumption is very strong, th case of any conflict the senior-most member will be the Karta of the family,

However, if the senior-most member does not want to continue as Karta he can relinquish his position and with the consent of other coparceners another member of coparcenary (not necessarily senior in line) will become Karta.

As regards the question whether a female can be a Karta? Supreme Court in CIT v. Seth Govindram Sugar Mills, AIR 1966 SC. 24, held that female member cannot be a Karta because she cannot be a coparcener.

However, after 2005 Amendment, position has changed and now females can be coparcener. There- fore, now, in the absence of male member, female can be a Karta. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping laws and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to ...

APPEALS - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

  Appeals "The word "appeal" means the right of carrying a particular case from an inferior court to a superior court with a view to ascertain whether the judgement is sustainable. An appeal is a creature of statute only and a right of appeal exists where expressly given. A right of appeal is neither an inherent right nor a fundamental right. Right to appeal is not merely a procedural right. It is a substantive right as well. This right accrues on the date of lis though it may be exercised later. Section 372 provides that no appeal lie from any judgment or order of a criminal court except as provided for this Code or any other law for the time being in force." Right of victim to file appeal : In Section 372 a proviso was inserted by Cr.P.C. (Amendment) Act, 2008, provides that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the court (i) Acquitting the accused; or (ii) Convicting for a lesser offence; or (iii) Imposing inadequate com...

JURISPRUDENCE

  JURISPRUDENCE   Jurisprudence is derived from Latin word ‘juris-prudentia’- knowledge of law or skill in law. Study of jurisprudence first started by Romans. Jeremy Bentham(1748-1832) is known as father of  modern jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is basically the theoretical aspect of the word law. In jurisprudence, we do not deal with the practically applicable pieces of statutory law; rather we try to understand the very essence of law and its various dimensions. Like in the other subjects, for example, geography, we have geographical thought as a subject of study, similarly, in law we have got "legal thought" which is called "jurisprudence". The basic questions that we try to answer in jurisprudence are - What is law?, Why should it exist?. What should be the nature and purpose of the law?, What are rights and duties and what should be their nature?, What is ownership and possession and why does law have to protect them?, etc. Jurisprudence refers to a certain type...