Skip to main content

Oleum Gas Leak Case

Oleum Gas Leak Case

M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, AIR (1987) SC 965, 982, 1086 

This case is also known as the Oleum gas leak case, as it arose from a leakage of oleum gas from a plant operated by Shriram Foods and Fertilizers Industries in Delhi, India, in December 1985. The gas leak caused harm to several people, including the death of an advocate. A writ petition was filed by M.C. Mehta, a public interest lawyer, seeking the closure or relocation of the plant, as it was situated in a densely populated area and posed a serious threat to the life and health of the people.

The Supreme Court of India, in a landmark judgment, held that the plant was engaged in a hazardous and inherently dangerous industry, and therefore, it was liable to pay compensation to the victims of the gas leak, regardless of any negligence or fault on its part. This was based on the principle of absolute liability, which was evolved by the court to deal with such cases involving violation of the fundamental right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The court also laid down certain guidelines and directions for the regulation and control of such industries, and for the prevention and remediation of environmental pollution.

This case is considered as a milestone in the development of environmental law and jurisprudence in India, as it established the constitutional duty of the state and the private sector to protect and improve the environment, and the right of the citizens to seek judicial redress for any harm caused by environmental degradation. It also demonstrated the proactive role of the Supreme Court in enforcing the fundamental rights and the rule of law through public interest litigation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping laws and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to ...

APPEALS - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE

  Appeals "The word "appeal" means the right of carrying a particular case from an inferior court to a superior court with a view to ascertain whether the judgement is sustainable. An appeal is a creature of statute only and a right of appeal exists where expressly given. A right of appeal is neither an inherent right nor a fundamental right. Right to appeal is not merely a procedural right. It is a substantive right as well. This right accrues on the date of lis though it may be exercised later. Section 372 provides that no appeal lie from any judgment or order of a criminal court except as provided for this Code or any other law for the time being in force." Right of victim to file appeal : In Section 372 a proviso was inserted by Cr.P.C. (Amendment) Act, 2008, provides that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the court (i) Acquitting the accused; or (ii) Convicting for a lesser offence; or (iii) Imposing inadequate com...

JURISPRUDENCE

  JURISPRUDENCE   Jurisprudence is derived from Latin word ‘juris-prudentia’- knowledge of law or skill in law. Study of jurisprudence first started by Romans. Jeremy Bentham(1748-1832) is known as father of  modern jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is basically the theoretical aspect of the word law. In jurisprudence, we do not deal with the practically applicable pieces of statutory law; rather we try to understand the very essence of law and its various dimensions. Like in the other subjects, for example, geography, we have geographical thought as a subject of study, similarly, in law we have got "legal thought" which is called "jurisprudence". The basic questions that we try to answer in jurisprudence are - What is law?, Why should it exist?. What should be the nature and purpose of the law?, What are rights and duties and what should be their nature?, What is ownership and possession and why does law have to protect them?, etc. Jurisprudence refers to a certain type...