Skip to main content

ORDER

 Order 

According to Section 2(14), an order means the formal expression of any decision of a civil court which is not a decree. Thus, the adjudication of a court of law may either be decree or an order but cannot be both. There are same common elements in both of them such as both relate to matters is controversy, both are decision of civil court and both are formal expression of a decision.

ORDER vs DECREE

Order

1. An order may be passed in a suit or may be passed in a proceeding commenced by a petition or an application. For example, in an application to sue as a pauper, the decision of court rejecting such application is not a decree but order as per Section 2(14)

2. An order may or may not finally determine such rights.

3. There is no such classification in case of an order.

4. In case of a suit or proceeding, a number of orders may be passed.

5. Every order is not appealable unless shown as appealable under Section 104 and Order 43 Rule 1

6. No second appeal lies in case of appealable orders [Section 104 (2)]


Decree

1. A decree can only be passed in a suit which commenced by a presentation of a plaint.

2. A decree is an adjudication conclusively determining the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy.

3. A decree may be preliminary, final or partly preliminary and partly final.

4. Except in certain suits, where decree, one preliminary and one final are passed, in every suit, there can only be one decree.

5. Every decree is appealable unless otherwise expressly provided (as in the case of consent decree which is non-appealable.

6. A second appeal lie to the High Court on certain grounds from the decree passed in First Appeal. [Section 100]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping law s and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to...

Companies act ,2013

Companies Act, 2013 Meaning and Nature of a Company with Emphasis on its Advantages 1. Meaning of a Company : A company is a legal entity formed by a group of individuals to engage in and operate a business commercial or industrial enterprise. It is governed by the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in India. According to Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, "Company means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law." Lord Justice Lindley : "A company is an association of many persons who contribute money or money's worth to a common stock and employ it for a common purpose. The common stock so contributed is denoted in money and is the capital of the company." A company is an artificial person created by law. It has a separate legal identity distinct from its members. It can enter into contracts, own property, sue, and be sued in its own name. 2. Nature of a Company : The nature of a company can be understood through its key ...

Interlocutory order

  Interlocutory order Rule 6 to 10 of Order 39 mention certain interlocutory orders that can be made by the court. The term 'interlocutory order' is not defined in the Code. It means an order passed by a court during pendency of a suit or in course of execution proceedings which do not determine the substantive rights of the parties in respect of subject-matter of the suit but relates to the protection of the subject-matter of the suit or for ensuring determination of merits of the case. For eg.: (i) Ordering sale of perishable property in certain cases [Rule 6] (ii) Order for detention, preservation or inspection of any property forming subject-matter of suit [Rule 7]. (iii) Order authorizing any person to enter into any land or buildings and take samples or try experiments [Rule 8]. (iv) Order to deposit the money held by a person as a trustee, in court [Rule 10], etc.