Skip to main content

Transfer of Suits

 Transfer of Suits



Sections 22 to 25 enact the law as regards transfer and withdrawal of suits and appeals from one court to another court. Section 22 read with Section 23 enables the defendant to apply for transfer of a suit while Section 24 empowers High Court and District Court and 25 empowers Supreme Court to transfer any suit or appeal either upon application made by the party or suo motu.

Transfer of suits

  • Who may apply (Section 22)- Defendant 
  • To what court application lies (Section 23)
  • General power of transfer (Section 24) -District Court & High Court
  • Power of Supreme Court to transfer (Section 25)

Who may apply: Section 22 provides that the defendant may apply to the court for transfer of suit to another court in case a suit may be instituted in any one of two or more courts. Before transfer is ordered under Section 22, following conditions must be satisfied:

(i) The application must be made at earliest possible opportunity either at or before settlement of issues,

(ii) Notice must be given to the other side. 

Hearing of objections: After notice is served to the other party, the court must decide that application of transfer after hearing of objections of the opposite party.

Suo-motu transfer: Over and above an application by a party to the suit, High Court or District Court has power to transfer the suit or appeal even suo motu under Section 24. However, Section 25 does not provide for suo motu transfer of the suit or appeal by the Supreme Court.

To what court application lies [Section 23]: Section 23 provides that application under Section 22 lies to the following Courts:-

Subordinate to same Appellate Court: Where the several courts having jurisdiction are subordinate to the same Appellate Court, application shall be made to the Appellate Court,

Subordinate to different Appellate Courts: Where such courts are subordinate to different Appellate Courts, but to the same High Court, the application shall be made to the said High Court;

Subordinate to different High Courts: Where such Courts are subordinate to different High Courts, the application shall be made to the High Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the court in which the suit is brought is situated. 

General power of transfer and withdrawal - Section 24

Under Section 24, after hearing the parties, the High Court or District Court may, at any stage:

(a) Transfer any suit or appeal or other proceedings pending before it for trial or disposal to any court sub-ordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of the same.

(b) Withdraw any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending in any court sub-ordinate to it and transfer the same for trial or disposal to any other competent court sub-ordinate to it or retransfer the same for trial to the court from which it was withdrawn.

Such transfer may be made from a court which has no jurisdiction to try it [Section 24(5)].

Power of Supreme Court to transfer the case: Section 25 provides that on the application of a party, and after notice to the parties, and after hearing such of them as desired to be heard, the Supreme Court may, at any stage, if satisfied that an order is expedient for the ends of justice, direct that any suit, appeal or other proceeding be transferred from a High Court or other Civil Court in one State to a High Court or other Civil Court in any other State.

Every application for this purpose shall be made by a motion which shall be supported by an affidavit. While dismissing any application if the Supreme Court is of opinion that the application was frivolous or vexatious, it may order the applicant to pay compensation up to 2000 rupees to any person who has opposed the application.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theories of Punishment

Theories of Punishment Punishment in law serves multiple purposes, and the rationale behind these punishments can be understood through different theories of punishment. These theories form the foundation for justifying punishment and help in shaping law s and sentencing policies. Here’s a detailed explanation of each theory with examples: 1. Deterrent Theory The deterrent theory focuses on preventing crime by imposing severe punishments to create fear among people. The idea is that potential offenders will refrain from committing crimes if they fear punishment. Example : The death penalty or long-term imprisonment for serious offenses like murder or terrorism acts as a deterrent for those considering committing such crimes. 2. Retributive Theory This theory is based on the principle of "an eye for an eye" or giving the offender what they deserve. It focuses on vengeance or moral satisfaction, ensuring the punishment is proportionate to the crime committed. The goal is not to...

Companies act ,2013

Companies Act, 2013 Meaning and Nature of a Company with Emphasis on its Advantages 1. Meaning of a Company : A company is a legal entity formed by a group of individuals to engage in and operate a business commercial or industrial enterprise. It is governed by the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 in India. According to Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, "Company means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law." Lord Justice Lindley : "A company is an association of many persons who contribute money or money's worth to a common stock and employ it for a common purpose. The common stock so contributed is denoted in money and is the capital of the company." A company is an artificial person created by law. It has a separate legal identity distinct from its members. It can enter into contracts, own property, sue, and be sued in its own name. 2. Nature of a Company : The nature of a company can be understood through its key ...

JURISPRUDENCE

  JURISPRUDENCE   Jurisprudence is derived from Latin word ‘juris-prudentia’- knowledge of law or skill in law. Study of jurisprudence first started by Romans. Jeremy Bentham(1748-1832) is known as father of  modern jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is basically the theoretical aspect of the word law. In jurisprudence, we do not deal with the practically applicable pieces of statutory law; rather we try to understand the very essence of law and its various dimensions. Like in the other subjects, for example, geography, we have geographical thought as a subject of study, similarly, in law we have got "legal thought" which is called "jurisprudence". The basic questions that we try to answer in jurisprudence are - What is law?, Why should it exist?. What should be the nature and purpose of the law?, What are rights and duties and what should be their nature?, What is ownership and possession and why does law have to protect them?, etc. Jurisprudence refers to a certain type...